Shivraj accused Digvijay of 'creating division like the British'...
Shivraj accused Digvijay of 'creating division like the British'...Former chief minister Digvijay Singh, who is contesting from the Rajgarh lok sabha seat, has been accused by former chief minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan of ruling by creating divisions among the people like the British. Responding to this attack, congress has said that on june 4 it will be known who the people are angry with. Former chief minister Shivraj Singh Chauhan sought votes from the public for bjp candidate Rodmal nagar in the Rajgarh lok sabha seat. During this time he also addressed the general meeting. Former chief minister Shivraj Singh Chauhan, while addressing the general meeting, said that both Digvijay Singh and himself are former Chief Ministers, but there is a difference between the two.Digvijay Singh did not develop in 10 years – Shivraj Singh ChauhanShivraj Singh Chauhan further said, 'Bharatiya Janata Party's government seeks votes by developing the people, whereas Digvijay Singh is a leader who contests elections not on development but on management. He had the responsibility of chief minister of madhya pradesh for 10 years but he did not bring development. Shivraj Singh alleged, 'Digvijay Singh intended to rule by making the people fight among themselves. The way the british used to rule by dividing, Digvajay Singh also had the same working style. During his tenure, he has made farmers fight among themselves by distributing land leases among the public.'We will know on june 4'- CongressAccording to madhya pradesh congress Committee spokesperson mukesh nayak, all the allegations of former chief minister Shivraj Singh Chauhan are false. First of all, he should think about why bjp did not make him the Chief Minister. nayak also said that the results of the lok sabha elections will be revealed on june 4. In madhya pradesh, not congress candidates but the public are contesting elections on many seats including Rajgarh. Now only the public will decide who is right and who is wrong.