sunil gavaskar and Alan Border need to have provided BGT trophy together: Clarke

Former australia captain Michael Clarke has expressed disappointment over the absence of indian cricket legend sunil gavaskar for the duration of the Border-Gavaskar Trophy presentation.

Clarke believes that each Gavaskar and Allan Border, the two legends after whom the trophy is known as, need to had been gift on the podium after Australia's three-1 series victory over india in Sydney.

The Border-Gavaskar Trophy is a image of the long-standing cricketing rivalry among the two countries and a tribute to the big contributions of both Gavaskar and Border to the sport. however, all through the trophy presentation,

most effective Allan Border turned into present to hand the silverware

to Australian captain Pat Cummins, leading to significant grievance of cricket Australia's decision to exclude Gavaskar. talking to ESPN's around the Wicket.

"I just suppose cricket australia missed a trick. Now I recognise a lot of human beings do not know that it become planned before the series commenced, that if india were to win, sunil gavaskar would present the trophy. If australia were to win, Alan Border would gift the trophy. So it wasn't a wonder to those two guys. but to me, it just would not make sense. Like, they may be both there," Clarke said.

"no matter who gained, in my view, they each have to have walked out, they both ought to had been on degree, they each ought to have provided the trophy. I suppose we're very lucky to have both Allan Border and Sunny Gavaskar within the u . s . commentating at the proper time. You don't get that very frequently. each legends of the game that the trophy is named are nonetheless round and are in the country at the equal time. So I simply think we missed a trick there. I assume it sounds to me that, you recognize, it glaringly affected, it indignant Sunny as properly, and i will understand why. I assume they each should had been on that level providing that trophy no matter who won," he introduced.

The absence of the indian legend at such a massive moment has left many lovers and cricket enthusiasts disheartened. Gavaskar, regarded as one of the finest cricketers in records, has been instrumental in raising indian cricket on the global degree, similar to Allan Border's transformative role in Australian cricket.

Responding to the backlash

, cricket australia acknowledged that having both legends gift would had been extra fitting

. The choice has reignited discussions approximately the importance of inclusivity and proper popularity in cricketing ceremonies, particularly for activities of such ancient significance.

Clarke highlighted the importance of honouring the legacy of each legends to hold the integrity and spirit of the trophy, specifically if both the legends are present on the venue.

while Australia's dominant 3-1 series win marked a historic achievement, the absence of Gavaskar on the presentation ceremony has cast a shadow over what must had been a party of cricketing excellence and shared legacy. shifting forward, cricketing government are expected to take steps to hold the spirit and respect that iconic tournaments like the Border-Gavaskar Trophy represent.