Afridi-Aamir standoff - both have different claims

Sekar Chandra

Afridi-Aamir standoff - both have different claims…

pakistan cricket's two heavyweight players shahid Afridi and mohammad amir have become determined on an old case related to Babar Azam. During pakistan Super League (PSL)-8, Aamir has 'retaliated' on the claim made by Afridi in the case of alleged misbehavior with Peshawar Zalmi team captain Babar Azam. shahid Afridi had earlier claimed that he had sent a message to Amir and reprimanded him for his on-field behavior with Babar.

In fact, Aamir had thrown the ball towards Babar in frustration after getting a boundary on his ball, due to this behavior he had to become a victim of criticism. Afridi had said at that time, 'If you want to play for pakistan, then you have to play with Babar. In this situation, will you be able to look into his eyes? Will you be able to play under his captaincy? Pay attention to your performance. Control your aggressive attitude and go back home peacefully. Boom-boom Afridi had also claimed that Aamir had understood his point and apologized for his behaviour.

After about four months, now Aamir has broken the silence on this issue and denied Afridi's statement outright.According to the report of Cricketpakistan.com, Aamir revealed in an interview given to a local news channel that Afridi A message was received from but it was not related to the incident narrated by Afridi. According to the left-arm fast bowler, Afridi had praised his bowling in the message and asked about his fitness.

Aamir said, 'I had received his message but it was not this. He only praised my bowling and asked about my injury but 'how will you cope with Babar' was not in the text message. What harm have I done to Amir or he to me? Put. I don't know what he (Shahid Afridi) was thinking when he said this. I think he lives in a bit of a hurry, in which case he might have said it by mistake.' Aamir also said that he and Babar have mutual understanding and respect for each other and the two never get into an argument. There has been no malice. Despite this, these two are often projected as 'enemies' which is wrong.

Find Out More:

Related Articles: