In a dramatic turn of events during protests at parliament, bjp mp pratap chandra sarangi sustained a head injury, allegedly caused by an altercation involving congress leader rahul Gandhi. This incident has brought Congress’s commitment to parliamentary decorum under serious scrutiny, with the bjp accusing the opposition of orchestrating chaos to deflect from their lack of constructive political discourse.

The scuffle reportedly occurred amidst protests against Union home minister amit Shah's remarks on Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. While the congress used the protests as an opportunity to target the bjp, the ruling party has countered by highlighting the incident as an example of the opposition’s disruptive and unruly tactics. Sarangi alleges that rahul gandhi pushed a bjp mp, causing a domino effect that led to his injury. The bjp has been quick to frame this as part of a larger pattern of the Congress’s inability to engage in mature and respectful debate.

A Question of Accountability

The bjp has argued that Gandhi's actions demonstrate a disregard for the sanctity of Parliament. “This is not just about one injury—it’s about a repeated failure by the congress to uphold democratic principles,” a senior bjp leader commented. By turning parliamentary protests into physical confrontations, the congress has, according to critics, degraded the institution’s reputation.

Adding fuel to the fire, bjp leaders have pointed out that this isn’t the first time the congress has been accused of creating disorder. They argue that the party often resorts to sensationalism instead of engaging in meaningful dialogue, a tendency that was on full display during this incident.

Congress’s Defense Falls Flat

rahul Gandhi’s counterclaim—that bjp MPs blocked and threatened him—has done little to mitigate the controversy. Instead, it has only deepened the divide, with many viewing his response as an attempt to shift blame. Critics have questioned why Gandhi, who often advocates for civility, found himself at the center of such an incident.

Furthermore, the Congress’s focus on sensational protests rather than issue-based debates has raised questions about its priorities. The opposition’s inability to present a cohesive strategy during parliamentary sessions has often drawn criticism, and this incident only reinforces perceptions of disarray within the party ranks.

The Bigger Picture

At a time when parliament should be a space for addressing pressing national issues, incidents like these undermine its role as the cornerstone of democracy. The bjp has positioned itself as a party focused on governance and accountability, contrasting this with what it describes as the Congress’s theatrics.

For many, the injury sustained by Pratap Sarangi is symbolic of a deeper malaise—a political culture that prioritizes disruption over dialogue. As the bjp continues to demand an apology and accountability, the congress data-faces a pivotal moment to reassess its approach to opposition politics. Whether they choose to rise to the occasion or continue down the path of disruption will have lasting implications for their role in indian democracy