Huge Changes - Old Gen Actors Vs Pan-India Gen Actors!
- Pan-Indian cinema prioritizes universal storytelling.
- Shift to Pan-Indian films reduces heroes' annual output.
- Higher production costs and risks are associated with Pan-Indian projects.
The indian film industry encompasses various language-specific sectors, but Pan-Indian cinema transcends linguistic boundaries. It represents a universal narrative and emotional resonance, captivating audiences regardless of language. This concept gained prominence after Baahubali.
For beloved heroes, undertaking a Pan-India film means dedicating three to four years to a single project. This lengthy commitment creates significant gaps between releases, fueling fans' anticipation and skyrocketing expectations. Furthermore, the financial stakes are extremely high, as Pan-India productions cost five times more than conventional films. Consequently, even if the movie is moderately successful, producers data-face significant financial risks if it underperforms, as the enormous investment can be difficult to recover.
Veteran heroes like NTR, Ayannar, and krishna exemplified productivity, releasing 4-5 films annually, with many achieving success. Lower production costs mitigated risks, making failures less consequential for producers. Notably, super star krishna would occasionally reduce his remuneration to support producers in cases of financial strain. In contrast, contemporary films with budgets exceeding hundreds of crores data-face immense pressure to succeed, as a single flop can be catastrophic for producers.