Boyapati’s Logic Behind Hero’s Dual Role
Boyapati's films are known for their intense action sequences, thick makeup on the women, blood all over the place, and the hero taking out dozens or even hundreds of bad guys by himself. The majority of the movie's sequences are illogical. However, Boya's most recent films share one additional thing in common: they all have heroes who play two roles.
Boyapati has an answer for the dual role that makes sense from the director's perspective after being asked the same question in a recent interview. boyapati usually introduces a strong figure that is shown as a tremendous force overshadowing the hero himself for Simha, Legend, Akhanda, and Skanda. boyapati defends his notion of a dual part when questioned whether it is becoming tiresome and why he doesn't surprise the audience with another great hero instead of going for it.
The skanda director acknowledges that the movie's dominant hero is also his most strong character, but he insists that actor should also play both roles. boyapati claims that the actor, who has supported him and put in a lot of effort, doesn't want to play a role that is rendered unconscious when another hero saves the day.
Why would a hero allow another hero to triumph just by playing a supporting role in the dramatic climax? boyapati has shown an appealing line of reasoning here. But given that Boyapati's works have already made this a clear point, it must come to an end someplace.
Boyapati has an answer for the dual role that makes sense from the director's perspective after being asked the same question in a recent interview. boyapati usually introduces a strong figure that is shown as a tremendous force overshadowing the hero himself for Simha, Legend, Akhanda, and Skanda. boyapati defends his notion of a dual part when questioned whether it is becoming tiresome and why he doesn't surprise the audience with another great hero instead of going for it.
The skanda director acknowledges that the movie's dominant hero is also his most strong character, but he insists that actor should also play both roles. boyapati claims that the actor, who has supported him and put in a lot of effort, doesn't want to play a role that is rendered unconscious when another hero saves the day.
Why would a hero allow another hero to triumph just by playing a supporting role in the dramatic climax? boyapati has shown an appealing line of reasoning here. But given that Boyapati's works have already made this a clear point, it must come to an end someplace.