Did they think the people of the country were ignorant..!?

As the case related to the controversial dialogues in the film Adipurush came up for hearing in the allahabad High court today, the court bombarded the film crew with a barrage of questions. Adipurush is a film based on one of the epics, Ramayana, starring prabhas, the hero of Baahubali. prabhas played the role of Sri Ram. bollywood leading actress kriti sanon played the role of Janaki. The film was directed by Om Rawat with a budget of around 600 crores. This 3D animated film was released on 16th june in 5 languages Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, Hindi, and Kannada. After Baahubali, Prabhas' films have been flops, and the film was released with high expectations. Prabhas's fans also greeted him with cheers. And in the theaters where the film was released, they asked Hanuman to reserve a seat and did the same according to the requests of the film crew. But the film met with negative reviews from the first day of its release. Despite a poor first-day collection, the film was pulled from the theaters within a week due to a lack of success in subsequent theaters. Similarly, the lines like 'Sita is the daughter of India' and some scenes in this film have sparked controversy.
Similarly, a letter has been written to prime minister Modi on behalf of the All india Film workers Union to ban Adipurush. It said that the screenplay and many dialogues of the movie Aadipurush are offensive and said to be bad to the religious sentiments and Sanatana dharma of Hindus. The characters Raman and Ravana in the film are shown as puppets from a video game. Therefore, the film also should be banned from screening and also released in OTT. In addition, the film's director Om Rawat, writer Manoj Shukla and the producer should be filed an FIR. They mentioned in that letter that the movie Adipurush is a disaster. Following this, a case has been filed in the court regarding the subtitles of Adipurush, and this case has come up for hearing today. The lucknow branch of the allahabad High court, which heard the case... bombarded the film crew and the investigation team with a barrage of questions.
In the court hearing about this the way the dialogues and characters in the movie Adipurush were designed to hurt Hindu feelings. Did you think the people of the country were ignorant? It is surprising that the people who watched the movie did not disturb the law and order. Hanuman and Sita are shown as insignificant. Some scenes should have been removed. Some scenes are watchable by people above 18 years of age. It is very difficult to watch such films. This is an important point. The Censor Board has also questioned why the Censor Board failed to properly censor the film. And during the investigation, why did the producer, director, and others concerned. It is noteworthy that not only has the court questioned the non-appearance, but it has also been ordered to send a related notice to the concerned people today.