Judge Anita Sumant, who heard the petition, had ordered an interim stay on the GST Commissioner's notice. When the case came back for hearing, the GST. A reply was filed by the Commissioner. In it, it has been stated that the notice was sent to AR Rakhuman based on the evidence of tax evasion and there was no intention to tarnish his reputation. According to the reply petition, the tax was levied on the basis of the information collected by the GST Investigation Unit and the penalty was imposed for non-payment.
While perusing the contracts with the producers and the statements obtained from them during the investigation, only the
{{RelevantDataTitle}}