Two nightclub owners accused of a fire that killed 25 people left india within hours, taking an indigo flight from delhi to Thailand. Everything about their escape — the location, the timing, the airport, the airline, the jurisdiction — points to one glaring truth critics highlight: every link in this chain was under a bjp government, yet the questions somehow never reach those in power. Instead, commentary is directed at the accused, not the system that allegedly enabled the exit.

1. The fire Was in goa — A BJP-Run State

A nightclub operating without proper safety clearances, no emergency exits, and with alleged illegal extensions was able to function until it burned 25 people alive. Critics argue this reflects a collapse of local regulation under the ruling party’s watch.

2. The Escape Happened Through delhi — Also Under bjp Rule

The accused didn’t sneak through a data-border. They calmly walked into India’s capital city airport, checked in, boarded a flight, and left.

The questions being raised are simple:
If Lookout Circulars matter, why were they issued after the departure?

3. They Fled on indigo — An Airline Under Centre’s Aviation Jurisdiction

In a week full of indigo controversies, operational chaos, and regulatory criticism, two high-profile accused escaping on this very airline has become a symbol of what many call India’s weakening enforcement ecosystem.

4. Ordinary Citizens Couldn’t Fly, But the Accused Did

For days, passengers were stranded, cancellations were rampant, and crowds were stuck at airports. Yet two men facing arrest allegedly had no trouble securing seats on an international flight. Critics call this “the ultimate privilege test.”

5. For Five Days, the central government Said Action Would Be Taken Against IndiGo

Public anger grew, statements were issued, and warnings floated. And then, two fugitives left on the same airline without obstruction. Observers are questioning whether this was a coincidence, incompetence, or systemic failure.

6. The Centre Controls Aviation. The Centre Is Run by the BJP.

When people ask who is responsible for airport security, immigration checks, airline oversight, and lookout circular coordination, the answer is straightforward: the central government. This is why critics are stunned that the spotlight is shifted away from those who hold the levers.

7. Yet Some Commentators Attack Only the Accused — Not the System That Enabled the Escape

The outrage online is sharp: how can the conversation stop at “cowards ran away”?
People are demanding tougher questions — the kind that challenge power, not just mock fugitives. Critics say that questioning only the accused is convenient; questioning the government requires courage.

8. Every Link in the Escape Chain Was Under the Same Party’s Governance

• The state where the tragedy happened
• The capital city where the escape occurred
• The airline that carried them
• The aviation authority that oversaw operations
• The central government controls enforcement

Critics argue that when every jurisdiction belongs to the same political party, accountability cannot be outsourced to commentary or emotional rhetoric.

9. The Real Question Is Not “Why Did They Flee?” — But “Why Were They Allowed To?”

In any functioning system, those accused in a mass-casualty disaster should not be on an international flight within hours. That is the heart of the criticism. The issue is not their courage or cowardice — the issue is the machinery that failed to stop them.