Modi condemns Attack on Hindu Temple in Canada but why silent when Mosques and Churches are attacked in India?
Prime minister Narendra Modi’s condemnation of the recent attack on a Hindu temple in canada highlights his support for protecting Hindu places of worship abroad, yet it brings into focus the perceived disparity in responses to attacks on minority religious sites within India. Modi’s statement emphadata-sizes the protection of Hindu temples in foreign nations, reflecting the sentiment of many indian citizens who view such attacks as a threat to indian communities globally.
However, this selective condemnation raises questions domestically, especially as incidents of violence or vandalism targeting mosques, churches, and gurdwaras within india often go unaddressed by the highest levels of leadership. The discrepancy in response can create a perception that minority religious sites in india are less of a priority for the government, despite India's secular values enshrined in its constitution. netizens have started to question PM Modi on social media platforms.
This perception is especially impactful in a diverse nation like india, where religious harmony is crucial for social stability. When attacks on mosques, churches, or gurdwaras are not vocally condemned, it risks normalizing such acts, indirectly fostering an environment where minorities may feel marginalized or less protected. In contrast, a balanced approach in addressing all forms of religious violence could reinforce the government’s role as an unbiased protector of all faiths.
This disparity in condemnation has broader implications for India’s image as a secular, inclusive democracy. India’s diverse culture has historically embraced multiple religions, and the nation’s strength lies in this diversity. By consistently condemning violence against all places of worship—whether Hindu temples abroad or mosques, churches, and other sites within India—the government could foster greater national unity and respect. Addressing incidents impartially would send a clear message that india remains committed to its foundational values of religious freedom and equality. Such an approach could also improve India’s international standing, presenting it as a nation that genuinely upholds the rights of all communities, irrespective of religion, both domestically and globally.
This disparity in condemnation has broader implications for India’s image as a secular, inclusive democracy. India’s diverse culture has historically embraced multiple religions, and the nation’s strength lies in this diversity. By consistently condemning violence against all places of worship—whether Hindu temples abroad or mosques, churches, and other sites within India—the government could foster greater national unity and respect. Addressing incidents impartially would send a clear message that india remains committed to its foundational values of religious freedom and equality. Such an approach could also improve India’s international standing, presenting it as a nation that genuinely upholds the rights of all communities, irrespective of religion, both domestically and globally.