Sanjay Roy, the primary suspect in the rape-murder case of a trainee doctor at Kolkata’s RG Kar Medical college and Hospital, has come under scrutiny following the results of his polygraph test. The test, conducted by the cbi, flagged several false and unconvincing responses from Roy.
Details of the Polygraph Test
On august 25, 2024, Roy underwent a lie-detection test where he claimed that the victim was already deceased when he arrived at the seminar hall, where her body was discovered on august 9. Despite his claims of innocence, the polygraph indicated inconsistencies in his statements. According to reports, Roy appeared nervous and anxious during the test. He provided alibis and claimed he fled the scene out of fear after encountering the body.
Legal and Procedural Concerns
Roy’s defense attorney, Kavita Sarkar, raised concerns about the procedure, alleging that the defense was not informed about the polygraph test’s timing and location. This lack of notification meant that no defense lawyer was present during the test, potentially violating guidelines set by the National Human Rights Commission.
Background and Confessions
Roy, a 33-year-old civic volunteer, was arrested on august 10. Initially, he confessed to the crime and helped reconstruct the incident. However, he later retracted his confession, claiming he was being framed. The police had earlier found a Bluetooth device near the victim’s body, and CCTV footage placed him near the crime scene.
Roy reportedly told jail guards that he had no knowledge of the incident. He had consented to the polygraph test, claiming it would prove his innocence. Despite this, reports indicate glaring inconsistencies in his statements and an inability to explain injuries on his data-face or his presence in the hospital during the crime.
Further Investigation
The polygraph test, conducted at Kolkata’s Presidency Jail, lasted about four hours. Specialists from the Central Forensic Science Laboratory (CFSL) in delhi carried out the test. The cbi has requested permission from a local court to subject seven individuals, including Roy and former principal Sandip Ghosh, to further polygraph testing. While the results of these tests cannot be used as direct evidence in court, they are intended to guide the ongoing investigation.
Conclusion
The discrepancies highlighted by the polygraph test and procedural concerns surrounding Roy’s defense add layers of complexity to the investigation. As the cbi continues its probe, the results will be crucial in determining the next steps in this high-profile case.