Background of the Controversy

- A political controversy erupted during the Budget Session of parliament after congress leader Rahul gandhi referenced the Epstein Files.

- His remarks triggered a sharp response from Union minister Hardeep Singh Puri.

- The exchange intensified tensions between the Opposition and the Treasury benches.

- The issue centers on alleged links mentioned in the so-called Epstein files held by US authorities.

Rahul Gandhi’s Statements in Lok Sabha

- Rahul gandhi raised the matter while speaking in the Lok Sabha.

- He questioned why businessman Anil Ambani had not been jailed.

- gandhi claimed this was because Ambani’s name appears in the Epstein files.

- He also questioned Hardeep Singh Puri’s alleged connection to introductions involving Jeffrey Epstein.

- gandhi suggested puri knew who introduced Ambani to Epstein.

- His remarks immediately drew strong objections and reactions.

Remarks Made Outside Parliament

- After his speech, Rahul gandhi repeated his allegations to the media outside Parliament.

- He claimed the US Justice Department holds Epstein files containing the names of Hardeep puri and Anil Ambani.

- He presented this as a matter requiring public clarification and accountability.

- The repetition of the charge expanded the controversy beyond the house proceedings.

Hardeep Singh Puri’s Response

- puri firmly rejected the allegations and called them baseless.

- He accused Rahul gandhi of having a pattern of making unfounded claims.

- He stressed that the Epstein files relate to serious criminal accusations and victims.

- puri said linking names casually to such material is irresponsible.

- He denied any wrongdoing or improper association.

Puri’s Explanation of the Meeting

- puri described the interaction being referenced by Gandhi.

- He said that in november 2014, he was a private citizen.

- He met LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman on the US West Coast.

- Someone expressed interest in visiting india during that interaction.

- puri said he only encouraged a visit to india due to business opportunities.

- He maintained the exchange had no connection to Epstein.

Political Impact

- The clash added to an already heated Budget Session atmosphere.

- Both sides engaged in verbal attacks over credibility and intent.

- The matter has now become part of a broader political war of words.

- Further debate and possible demands for clarification are expected.

Disclaimer:

The information contained in this article is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure accuracy, we make no warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability of the content. Any reliance you place on the information is strictly at your own risk. The views, opinions, or claims expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any organization mentioned. We disclaim any liability for any loss or damage arising directly or indirectly from the use of this article.