Who will be the next chief minister of Chhattisgarh? This question remains a topic of discussion in entireChhattisgarh. More than half a dozen bjp leaders are being targeted in the cm race. But no one is able to fix onany one name. The answer to this suspense is going to be found very soon. Because today the bjp legislatureparty meeting is going to be held. For this, huge preparations have been made in the state office of BJP. Drumsare being played in the airport to welcome the leaders.Meeting will be held in bjp office from 2 pm todayIn fact, all 54 bjp MLAs have been instructed to reach the state office from 12 noon today. After this, there willbe a meeting of the legislature party in the bjp office at 2 pm. In this meeting, the name of the leader of thelegislative party and the chief minister of the state will be finalized. Therefore, the eyes of the entire country arefixed on this meeting. State in-charge Om Mathur, Union minister and election co-in-charge Dr. MansukhMandaviya, bjp organization co-in-charge Nitin Nabin have reached Raipur.54 MLAs will decide the chief minister of ChhattisgarhLet us tell you that the legislature party meeting will be held this afternoon in the presence of observer UnionMinister arjun Munda, sarbananda sonowal and party's national general secretary Dushyant Kumar Gautamappointed by the BJP's central leadership. For this, all the observers have reached raipur at 9 am today. BJPState President Arun Saav, bjp National Vice President and former chief minister Dr. raman singh will alsoattend this meeting. Along with this, all the 54 MLAs who won the assembly elections will attend.CM deputy cm formula can be implementedPolitical pundits believe that bjp can use the CM-Deputy cm formula in Chhattisgarh. Opinion on this can betaken from MLAs in the meeting. After this, opinion will be taken from the MLAs for the post of Chief Minister.It is believed that tribals have played a big role in bjp winning the elections in Chhattisgarh. In NorthChhattisgarh, bjp defeated Congress.
Find Out More: