What took place at the meeting of the Ethics Committee?
What took place at the meeting of the Ethics Committee?
Mahua Moitra received a notification from the Ethics Committee in the Cash for Query case on november 2. Mahua left the meeting in a fury a few minutes after it began. Mahua claimed that she was questioned about personal and intimate matters. Members of the committee Danish ali and Giridhari Yadav also exited the meeting with Mahua. All of them claimed that Mahua was asked, "Who do you talk to at night?" by the chairman. bjp mp and member of the Ethics Committee Sumedhanand Saraswati responds to the topic of why mahua moitra was not given the opportunity to give her side of the story: "She was called in to the meeting, but she left after abusing the Chairman." How are we going to support them now that this has happened?Saraswati responds to your personal inquiries by saying that as this issue also included a personal email account, the inquiry will be posed in the same context. He claims that mahua moitra was only asked one or two questions before leaving and using derogatory language.Saraswati responds to the query by saying, "At whose expense did you travel abroad?" mahua moitra did not answer the phone when we tried to take her side in this whole situation. Following this, a second Ethics Committee meeting was held, during which the fact-finding report was put to a vote. Several participants in the same meeting requested that Darshan Hiranandani be called as well, but the chairman declined. bjp mp Sumedhanand Saraswati responds, "This is an internal matter and how can I tell you this outside the committee," to the query of why Darshan Hiranandani was not called.The members' presence during the voting process was the most fascinating aspect. Out of the fifteen members, only ten voted. Four bjp members, one from Shiv Sena, one from congress, and one each from JDU, BSP, CPM, and congress voted in favor. Preneet Kaur of congress has defended the Mahua case fact-finding report.
Mahua Moitra received a notification from the Ethics Committee in the Cash for Query case on november 2. Mahua left the meeting in a fury a few minutes after it began. Mahua claimed that she was questioned about personal and intimate matters. Members of the committee Danish ali and Giridhari Yadav also exited the meeting with Mahua. All of them claimed that Mahua was asked, "Who do you talk to at night?" by the chairman. bjp mp and member of the Ethics Committee Sumedhanand Saraswati responds to the topic of why mahua moitra was not given the opportunity to give her side of the story: "She was called in to the meeting, but she left after abusing the Chairman." How are we going to support them now that this has happened?Saraswati responds to your personal inquiries by saying that as this issue also included a personal email account, the inquiry will be posed in the same context. He claims that mahua moitra was only asked one or two questions before leaving and using derogatory language.Saraswati responds to the query by saying, "At whose expense did you travel abroad?" mahua moitra did not answer the phone when we tried to take her side in this whole situation. Following this, a second Ethics Committee meeting was held, during which the fact-finding report was put to a vote. Several participants in the same meeting requested that Darshan Hiranandani be called as well, but the chairman declined. bjp mp Sumedhanand Saraswati responds, "This is an internal matter and how can I tell you this outside the committee," to the query of why Darshan Hiranandani was not called.The members' presence during the voting process was the most fascinating aspect. Out of the fifteen members, only ten voted. Four bjp members, one from Shiv Sena, one from congress, and one each from JDU, BSP, CPM, and congress voted in favor. Preneet Kaur of congress has defended the Mahua case fact-finding report.