Chandrababu is not the permanent president!?
Chandrababu Naidu and Co are criticizing the plenary meetings held by the ruling YCP. There is a campaign that Jaganmohan Redde is going to revise the constitution as the permanent president of the party. Whether to amend the constitution or hold elections and elect a president is entirely an internal matter of the party.
There is no need for Chandrababu or tdp leaders to interfere in this. Chandrababu Nagiri lashed out at the roadshow on the campaign of Jagannath as the permanent president. They were angry that they had resigned with mother Vijayamma as the honorary president.
Chandrababu objected to jagan being the permanent president. jagan is the permanent president..and another election is to be held..this is the party..can anyone come up with such bad ideas? They were excited.
Here comes a doubt in everyone. Has anyone ever become president of tdp in place of Chandrababu? Is the election of Chandrababu as the President in Mahanadu just a nominal thread? Is there a history of electing someone other than Chandrababu as president? What if the president is elected by a nominal vote? What if the party rules are revised and the president decides?
If the appointment of jagan as the permanent president of the party is invalid according to the rules, it is a matter between the party and the election Commission. This is not only related to ycp but in any regional party the election of president is like this directly or indirectly.
There is no need for Chandrababu and Co to get so excited about this. If there were any objections on the policy points spoken by jagan or others during the plenary, there was no mistake in turning them around. There is no doubt that corruption in the government should be cured. Moreover, there is no sense in holding a plenary to discuss what jagan has achieved.