Why All This Ruckus On Puri Jagannadh?
I'm not a fan of Puri. But do respond to my queries as a genuine movie fan!
Yes, handsome director puri Jagannadh.. is a swindler. Let's damage his reputation! He needs to be discredited for providing the music industry so many hits, setting so many records, and now for being torn between these conspiracies. Because he established a brand for all the tollywood star heroes and provided them with blockbusters, he has to be exposed as a cheater. He should be taken to the road with his family even if he lost hundreds of crores in his capacity as a director and producer because he refused to name anyone and hold them accountable. He must be ridiculed for his opinion that he leads an honest life and avoids insulting others. No matter how many times he was duped or how many duds he produced, the handsome director should be desecrated for always coming back with blockbusters
He got to this position after losing everything and starting over. We ought to chastise for setting an example. It's still early. Let's forget the times when we prowled around his home and he produced successful films. Let's now behave carelessly. Because... we now live in a time when people value money more than people... To demonstrate that it is a sobering truth, let's discredit puri Jagannath. Let's label him a thief and force him to sell his possessions once more.
While he was the one who lost the most money with Liger, let's blame his goodness and kill it for promising to make up some distributor and exhibitor losses! Even if he loses everything again in this manner, let's tell him not to act with goodness, not to care about anyone, and to place greater emphasis on selfishness. For producing hits like Businessman, Temper, iSmart Shankar, Amma Nanna O tamil Ammayi, Badri, Pokiri, Desamuduru, and Idiot... Make him feel guilty about himself! But ultimately, all the beautiful things were set aside, and with a single plop, the long-hidden conspiracies and politics came to light. So… All the distributors and exhibitors who opposed puri deserve praise.
As puri has already stated, there is a lot of gambling in the movie industry. Otherwise, the movie industry is a casino. While few films succeed, some are failures. If movies don't do well at the box office, very few people in the business will give the distributors their money back. puri is, however, prepared to reimburse the distributors for the losses of Liger. He also gave them a thorough explanation of everything. Distributors need to keep this in mind as well. They claim to have suffered losses in support of their request for a refund. Will the producers receive any extra funds if the same movies are successful and profitable? They must reflect on it. Give it some time, and everything will be resolved.