Why the charge of Hathras gangrape was not proved?P-2
Why the charge of hathras gangrape was not proved?P-2
Let's examine the factors that led the judge to release three defendants after the gangrape charge was deemed unproven.3. The cause of death was not the injury to the neck during the rapeAccording to the medical evidence presented before the court, there was a spinal cord injury. Its mark was also visible, which confirms the point of strangulation, but it does not prove that death was due to this.4. No wound like multiple people attackIt has also not been said in the medical report that the wounds found on the victim's body were of group assault. The court has said in the verdict that the wounds found on the body appeared to be of an attack by only one person. This undermines the involvement of many people in the harassment.5. Accused also benefit from repeated statements of the victimAccording to the court, the victim changed her statement several times, there is no similarity between the statement given to the woman constable and the statement recorded by the doctor. Apart from this, the statement given to the media persons on the day of the incident is also different, whose video recording is also there. After this, in the statement lodged with the police on september 22, the victim did not name the other accused.
Let's examine the factors that led the judge to release three defendants after the gangrape charge was deemed unproven.3. The cause of death was not the injury to the neck during the rapeAccording to the medical evidence presented before the court, there was a spinal cord injury. Its mark was also visible, which confirms the point of strangulation, but it does not prove that death was due to this.4. No wound like multiple people attackIt has also not been said in the medical report that the wounds found on the victim's body were of group assault. The court has said in the verdict that the wounds found on the body appeared to be of an attack by only one person. This undermines the involvement of many people in the harassment.5. Accused also benefit from repeated statements of the victimAccording to the court, the victim changed her statement several times, there is no similarity between the statement given to the woman constable and the statement recorded by the doctor. Apart from this, the statement given to the media persons on the day of the incident is also different, whose video recording is also there. After this, in the statement lodged with the police on september 22, the victim did not name the other accused.