The Vijay Divorce Exposes Everything: Why Feminists Cheer Homewreckers and Ghost Traditional Wives
**Feminism loves to scream “believe all women” — until the woman in question doesn’t fit their script.**
Take the messy Vijay divorce saga. On one side, you have sangeetha Sornalingam: married to the actor-turned-politician since 1999, mother of two, zero cheating scandals, zero affairs, all about traditional family values. She stood by him through the struggle years and only filed for divorce in 2025 after infidelity allegations.
On the other side? trisha krishnan — glamorous Tamil-Telugu star with a laundry list of rumored relationships, linked to multiple men over the years, and conveniently labeled Vijay’s “friend.”
**Now watch the selective outrage in real time:**
- social media explodes praising trisha like she just got sworn in as Chief Minister.
- Feminists rush to celebrate her while sangeetha, the actual wife who sacrificed decades, gets memory-holed.
- The same crowd that lectures about “toxic men” suddenly goes quiet when the narrative doesn’t let them paint the traditional wife as the villain.
This isn’t about one celebrity divorce. It’s textbook proof that feminism isn’t about protecting women — it’s about protecting the narrative. When a woman plays the “good wife” role with values and loyalty, she becomes invisible. But when she’s the independent, rumor-filled “modern” woman? Instant hero status.
Selective sisterhood at its finest. The mask slips every single time.