20 Boyfriends. 20 iPhones — Down Payment For A House — The Perfect Hustle

SIBY JEYYA

⚡WHEN HUSTLE CROSSES INTO INFAMY


In 2016, a story erupted out of Shenzhen that made people laugh, rage, and argue all at once. A woman reportedly dated 20 men simultaneously, convinced each to gift her the newly launched iPhone 7, sold the phones to a recycler for $19,900, and used the money as a down payment on a house.


No robbery.
No hacking.


Just manipulation, timing, and cold arithmetic.

And suddenly, the internet had a new uncomfortable question: Is this genius, or is it fraud dressed up as a hustle?




1️⃣ THE SETUP: ROMANCE AS A SUPPLY CHAIN


This wasn’t a one-off gift. It was a system.

Each boyfriend believed he was special. Each gift felt personal. Together, they became inventory. The iphone 7 launch — peak demand, peak resale value — was the perfect moment to strike.


Dating wasn’t the goal.
Aggregation was.




2️⃣ THE PRODUCT: WHY THE iphone 7 MATTERED


Newly launched apple products hold value better than almost anything else in consumer tech. In 2016, the iphone 7 was liquid cash in a box — easy to sell, easy to move, hard to trace.


Sell 20 fast, sell them together, and you turn romance into working capital.

This wasn’t an impulse.
It was market awareness.




3️⃣ THE FLIP: FROM GIFTS TO REAL MONEY


After collecting the phones, she sold them to a mobile recycler for $19,900 — enough for a property down payment in parts of china at the time.

No loans.
No inheritance.
Just resale margins.


Love entered as a sentiment.
Exited as cash.




4️⃣ THE REACTION: ADMIRATION, DISGUST, AND EVERYTHING IN BETWEEN


The internet split instantly:

  • “Queen. Strategic. Unfair world, fair play.”

  • “Deception. Exploitation. Emotional theft.”

What unsettled people most wasn’t the amount — it was the method.


She didn’t break the system.
She used it exactly as designed.




5️⃣ THE ETHICAL LINE: SMART OR SICK?


Legally, gifting phones isn’t a crime.
Morally, deception at this scale is harder to shrug off.

This wasn’t consent built on truth.


It was misrepresentation multiplied.

And yet, the story refuses to die because it exposes something darker: how easily attention, affection, and consumerism can be converted into assets.




6️⃣ WHY THIS STORY STILL GOES VIRAL


Because it hits three raw nerves at once:

  • Housing feels unreachable

  • Relationships feel transactional


  • Hustle culture celebrates results, not methods

When outcomes matter more than ethics, stories like this stop sounding absurd — and start sounding inevitable.




🧨 FINAL WORD: THE house STOOD. THE TRUST DIDN’T.


She got her down payment.
The house likely still stands.


But the story lingers because it forces a brutal truth into the open:

👉 In a world where everything has a price, even intimacy becomes leverage.


You can admire the intelligence.
You can condemn the deception.


But you can’t ignore what it reveals — not about one woman in Shenzhen, but about the systems that made this possible in the first place.

Find Out More:

Related Articles: