“Attempt to Newly Include 6.5 Million People in SIR” – Vaiko Alleges
MDMK General Secretary Vaiko has made a startling allegation, claiming that there is an attempt to newly include around 6.5 million (65 lakh) people in the SIR (Special Intensive Revision) process. He described this as a serious issue that could have far-reaching political and democratic implications.Vaiko’s AllegationSpeaking to the media, vaiko stated that large-scale additions to the SIR list are being attempted without adequate transparency and proper verification. He warned that such actions could:
- Distort electoral rolls
- Affect the fairness of the democratic process
- Raise serious questions about the integrity of voter registration
- Lead to irregularities in voter lists
- Allow scope for manipulation during elections
- Undermine public confidence in the electoral system
- Who authorized the inclusion of 65 lakh new names
- On what basis these additions are being made
- What verification mechanisms are being followed
- Opposition parties have echoed concerns about voter list revisions.
- Ruling parties are yet to issue a detailed response.
- Political analysts note that such claims could intensify debates around electoral reforms and voter data management.
ConclusionVaiko’s claim that there is an attempt to add 65 lakh new individuals to the SIR has sparked fresh controversy over the transparency and credibility of voter list revisions. As demands for clarification grow, the response of election authorities will be crucial in addressing concerns and maintaining public trust in the democratic process. Disclaimer:The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any agency, organization, employer, or company. All information provided is for general informational purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained herein. Readers are advised to verify facts and seek professional advice where necessary. Any reliance placed on such information is strictly at the reader’s own risk.