When Not A Single Arab Country Doesn't Want To Accept Palestinian Refugees Why France Accepts 2 Million Palestinians?
A recent ruling by France’s National court of Asylum (CNDA) has ignited a firestorm of controversy, declaring all 2 million Palestinians in Gaza eligible for asylum in France. Posted on X by Dr. Maalouf on July 14, 2025, the announcement, accompanied by a historical image of a Palestinian march, has prompted widespread discussion about the implications for French society and its relations with the Arab world. The decision, rooted in claims of persecution due to Israeli military actions, has been met with both alarm and criticism.
The CNDA’s landmark decision extends asylum eligibility to all Gazan residents, classifying Palestinians as a persecuted group based on their "nationality" and the ongoing conflict with Israel. This move comes despite France’s lack of formal recognition of palestine as a state. The accompanying black-and-white photograph, depicting a group of Palestinians marching with flags and headscarves, serves as a visual reminder of the region’s tumultuous history and the refugee crisis that has persisted since the mid-20th century. Dr. Maalouf’s post highlights the ruling’s potential consequences, questioning the wisdom of such a policy in light of historical precedents.
France’s decision to grant asylum eligibility to all Gazans is a bold and divisive move that has reopened old wounds and sparked new fears. As Dr. Maalouf’s post and the ensuing discussion suggest, the policy could reshape the nation’s demographic and cultural landscape, drawing parallels to the turbulent experiences of other host countries.
The CNDA’s landmark decision extends asylum eligibility to all Gazan residents, classifying Palestinians as a persecuted group based on their "nationality" and the ongoing conflict with Israel. This move comes despite France’s lack of formal recognition of palestine as a state. The accompanying black-and-white photograph, depicting a group of Palestinians marching with flags and headscarves, serves as a visual reminder of the region’s tumultuous history and the refugee crisis that has persisted since the mid-20th century. Dr. Maalouf’s post highlights the ruling’s potential consequences, questioning the wisdom of such a policy in light of historical precedents.
France’s decision to grant asylum eligibility to all Gazans is a bold and divisive move that has reopened old wounds and sparked new fears. As Dr. Maalouf’s post and the ensuing discussion suggest, the policy could reshape the nation’s demographic and cultural landscape, drawing parallels to the turbulent experiences of other host countries.