Reverse tendering was started by
jagan MOHAN REDDY' target='_blank' title='ys
jagan mohan reddy-Latest Updates, Photos, Videos are a click away, CLICK NOW'>ys
jagan mohan reddy as soon as he took
office in 2019, claiming that he would save a significant amount of money and that corruption was present in many projects. He also performed admirably on the
polavaram Project. After Navayuga was replaced, MEIL was introduced.
With pride, the
government of the time declared that the Reverse Tendering had saved 628.47 crores. The real situation, however, is startlingly different. Disregard the savings of 628.47 crores; the
government of
jagan paid the new contractor an additional 2268.68 crore. Money is not the only consideration.
jagan showed little concern for the strong opposition of the
indian government and the
polavaram project Authority to the concept of reverse tendering.
The Chief Executive Officer of Jal
shakti Ministry,
rk Jain, sent a
letter to the media. The
letter claims that preclosing the present tenders and retendering the
job is not necessary nor sufficient justification. "Such a step will result in unforeseen consequences and plunge the project into uncertainty," the then-Government was further cautioned. The project is not only likely to be delayed, but it will also likely have a negative socioeconomic impact since it will take longer for the benefits to be realised than expected, in addition to potentially increasing in cost.
RK Jain "humbly" asked that the concept be shelved or at the very least put on hold until the
indian government adopts a more thoughtful stance on the matter. Never mind about giving up on the concept—the
jagan government didn't even wait. That is
jagan Mohan Reddy's attitude towards
polavaram, which is considered Andhra Pradesh's lifeblood. This reverse tendering may have cost up to 68,000 crore when including in project losses, cost increases brought on by the delay, and advantages that were not received until later.
According to Chandrababu Naidu, finishing the project from here may need at least four seasons, or four years. Was the concept of reverse tendering the result of escalation brought on by incapacity or pride? or Does reverse tendering occur in exchange for bribes? The New
government ought to look into this.