Canada-India Tensions: Allegations Without Evidence?

Sindujaa D N
The allegations made by Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau regarding India's involvement in the murder of Khalistan terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar have sparked diplomatic tensions between the two countries. Despite Canada's inclusion of india in the ongoing investigation into foreign interference in Canadian elections, former National Security and Intelligence Advisor Jody Thomas revealed that india has been cooperating fully in the investigation of Nijjar's murder.

However, Canada's ally new zealand has taken a different stance on Trudeau's accusations. During his four-day visit to india, Kiwi Deputy prime minister and Foreign minister Winston Peters demanded evidence to substantiate Canada's claims of indian involvement in Nijjar's murder. Peters emphadata-sized that allegations should not be made without concrete evidence, highlighting the lack of proof provided by Canada.


This questioning of Canada's allegations marks a significant development, particularly within the Five Eyes Intelligence Alliance, which includes the United States, Australia, Britain, canada, and New Zealand. Despite previous support from America and Britain, New Zealand's stance challenges Canada's assertions and underscores the importance of evidence-based accusations.


The absence of evidence shared by canada regarding India's alleged involvement in Nijjar's murder case raises questions about the credibility of the accusations and the basis for diplomatic tensions between the two nations. As the situation unfolds, the differing perspectives within the Five Eyes alliance highlight the complexities of international relations and the importance of evidence-based diplomacy.

Find Out More:

Related Articles: